Is LSU-Alabama the right subject matchup?

BCS serving games are excellent, aren't they? Really like the program or dislike it, we get so much to talk about and issue throughout the period -- and even more once the period is over and the serving lineups are declared.
This seasons title activity was declared On the -- LSU vs. Al -- but the issue constantly anger. No one differences undefeated LSU's right to engage in for the BCS subject. But one-loss Al slightly surrounded one-loss Ok Condition for the No. 2 position in the ratings.

It's the subject activity everyone was anticipating going into the weekend break, but Ok Condition shut the gap with nonproductive Al through a 34-point success over No. 10 Ok. Still, when one more lots were counted, the Violet Hold surrounded the Boys by the tiniest of prices, .9419 to .9333.

Which simply leaves us with the first-ever rematch in the BCS subject activity (LSU won, 9-6, in in the long run initially around) -- a activity title that functions an Al group that not only did not win its convention, but completed second (to LSU) in its split.

Meanwhile, the Boys -- the Big 12 winners whose only reduction was in double-overtime to unranked Iowa Condition -- will not get a chance at LSU on the area this period.

What do you think? Did the BCS get it right by unsightly pitting LSU and Al against each other in the subject game? Or did Ok Condition are entitled to a chance at the championship? Election, then depart a thoughts conveying why you identified as the way you did

Bookmark and Share

Blog Archive